Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01204 (2)
Original file (ND99-01204 (2).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AGAN, USN
Docket No. ND99-01204

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990909, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000606. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. I would like the Board to consider upgrading my discharge from Naval service to an Honorable Discharge.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930428 - 930809  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930810               Date of Discharge: 970220

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 06 11
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 17                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 75

 Highest Rate: AG3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.93 (3)    Behavior: 4.00 (3)                OTA: 3.87        4.0 evals
 Performance: 3.00 (1)    Behavior: 4.00 (1)                OTA: 3.29        5.0 evals

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, GCM, SSDR (2), MUC, SASM with 1 Bronze Star

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

961115:  Applicant's sworn voluntary statement. Complete statement found on microfiche.

961119:  NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, CA reported applicant's urine sample received 961030 tested positive for tetrahydrocannabinol.
961125:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use a schedule I controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $558 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
961203:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your Commanding Officer's nonjudicial punishment of 25 November 1996.
961203:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
961205:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Hash abuse, random urinalysis 961004, 1 to 3 times per month, ashore off duty. Commanding officer recommended separate not via VA hospital.

970116:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

970203:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

970207:  Commander, Carrier Group FIVE directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970220 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01204

    Original file (ND99-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.961203: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your Commanding Officer's nonjudicial punishment of 25 November 1996.961203: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.961205: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Hash abuse, random...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01215

    Original file (ND99-01215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we find the FSM is seeking to upgrade his discharge to Honorable.The FSM underwent a Special Court-Martial and was found guilty for the use of controlled substances. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01138

    Original file (ND01-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 971126 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00303

    Original file (ND00-00303.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-OSSA, USNR Docket No. ND00-00303 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000105, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant requested board review evidence submitted with original...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00767

    Original file (ND02-00767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00767 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020509, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reenlistment code be changed to Re-1. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20030812. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00876

    Original file (ND00-00876.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    990412: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, but suspended for 6 months and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. As evidence by enclosure (1), the board found misconduct and recommended separation under Other Than Honorable conditions (suspended for six months). The applicant is reminded that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01282

    Original file (ND03-01282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENTex-ET1, USNDocket No. One who made a mistake on his time (leave) & has paid for it for over 6 ½ years now- PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19961127 with a general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to drug abuse (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00156

    Original file (ND04-00156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960703: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970103 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00194

    Original file (ND01-00194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for you time, please once again review my record of the 4 years I put into my country - thank you once again. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board recognizes that serving in the Navy is very challenging to both the Sailor and his family members. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00690

    Original file (ND00-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960405: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “ average conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were good” and he “received letters of...